O'Reilly Says ACLU Aids Terrorism?
Uploaded by: LiberalViewer
Video Description:
On Fox News this week, Bill O'Reilly's latest attack on the American Civil Liberties Union, claiming the ACLU aids terrorism, was based on fear and fallacies rather than facts as I show with the clips and analysis in this video.
You can see the ACLU's full page ad in the NY Times calling for teh closing of the prison at Guantanamo at http://www.closegitmo.com/nyt_ad.pdf
Three clips of Bill O'Reilly come from his November 17, 2008, Talking Points memo transcribed at http://tinyurl.com/5vj8mm
One clip of Bill O'Reilly comes from a June 13, 2008 segment I have not found available online.
You can see the full transcript of John McCain's April 2, 2007, interview on Fox News Sunday from which I took a short clip for my video at http://tinyurl.com/2dv2az
And, finally, you can find DOZENS and DOZENS more examples of Fox News bias on my Fox News bias playlist at http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=A3BD2524FE99BD4D
Tags for this video: 60 ACLU american barack bay Bill chris civil closegitmo cuba Factor Fox gitmo guantanamo interview john LiberalViewer liberties mccain minutes News O'Reilly obama president sunday terrorism torture union wallace
Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by LiberalViewer
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:














Lol it would save a whole lot of time and make the country safer.
Freedom of speech if they only agree with you, eh? You're a credit to democracy.
They're not interested in the Constitution, all they're interested in is progressing their crypto-socialist, Berkeley style, hippie-esque bullshit interpretations of the law.
How can you be so sure all 250 at Guantanamo are guilty of terrorism? Good to know before killing them.
Who are you to appoint yourselves as having a superior moral in the world? USA has never been perceived as having superior moral by the rest of the world, so that comment was fucking laughable.
USA = HATE and DEATH (At least the Reps)
It's funny how damn selective the ACLU are with their cases. I mean, their litigators will pounce on anyone who displays a nativity scene in public but not do so to other religious doniminations. Hell, I can think of a case where some jackoff required the Q'uran as required reading for his public history class to promote "tolerance" in the wake of 9/11.
Also, where was the ACLU when D.C. denied it's citizens the right to the 2nd Amendment? They didn't give two shits about that right. Guess what? The ACLU wasn't to happy with the Supreme Court's decision on SCOTUS they're many cases of hypocrisy on the ACLU's part I can list, but there's no room for that.
In short, the ACLU are bullshitters.
As it stands, republicans want to take away abortion and marriage rights. I don't care since neither affects me. Democrats want to take away my gun and financial rights, which does affect me so I s'pose I continue voting repub.
take a minute and actually learn about the ACLU, even just go to snopes and see what dumb things people have tried to put on the ACLU. just google "aclu fights for christians" and you will get plenty of links showing the true color of the ACLU.
As for your last assertions, I'd call that a token case so they can go "LOOK, we're not anti-christian!"
You seem to have overlooked one part of what I wrote: the ACLU go after mostly religious symbols associated with christianity while not showing the same discrimination against others such as Channukah and Ramadan.
Just google "ACLU hypocrisy and you'll get hundreds of thousands of hits.
Also, I believe the lawsuit ended in a settlement, typically meaning the acussers didn't have shit to take to court.
a settlements does not mean the accusers didn't have "shit" or billo the clown would have taken them to court and won and pay nothing to them. a settlement means that billo the clown was worried that he would loose and instead decided to pay them an amount they deemed good enough to avoid the court system altogether.